Lately I find myself, bringing the SIT methodology or should I say philosophy, more and more into my everyday life (I wonder what it means…?). Whether I am talking to my son, who hasn’t lost his creativity (yet), trying to solve a problem or drinking coffee with my husband - explaining to him what relationships and innovation processes have in common.
But today I want to focus my post on how I used the SIT problem-solving technique to solve our housing problem. About a year ago, a little after my younger son, Itamar, was born my husband Tal and I started looking for a bigger apartment. We felt that we needed a larger space, not so much for ourselves or the kids but more for all of our personal belongings. It just happened that the house was always a mess (I guess it’s also part of being a young mom for 2 boys but that is for a different post). After a few months of house- hunting, we once again, came to the realization that rent in Tel Aviv is ridiculously expensive so moving to a new apartment, assuming we refused to leave Tel Aviv, was not really an option.
If I wanted to tackle this issue wisely, I realized that I had to look into the root of the problem and understand what the real challenge we were facing was. So I starting asking myself: is our flat too small? Is it the fact that Tal has an office in the apartment? Is it the mess that’s bothering me? Or is it something completely else that I wasn’t aware of?
I used the time spent sitting in a really annoying traffic jam to analyze the problem. At the beginning I wasn’t even aware that I was building, in my mind (and later on a piece of paper), what we call in SIT a UDP chain – a chain of undesired phenomena.
I started by looking at the problem “the fact that our flat is too small” - which I thought at the beginning was the issue. Digging deeper I understood that what actually bothered me was that “my apartment is always a mess”.
From here it became easier, and I created the UDP chain with only a few phenomena. It looked something like this:
I get more frustrated
My place become messier
![]()
I give up trying to organize it
![]()
My apartment is always a mess
![]()
I don’t have enough storage places
![]()
The apartment is not built right
![]()
It is rented and not ours
To start looking for a solution, I decided to use what we call at SIT “qualitative change” (QC), which basically means changing the correlation between the harmful element and the phenomenon we would like to eliminate. Here’s a snapshot of my thinking process:
I took different pairs of UDP’s from the chain I created and tried to break the relationships between them. It looked something like this:
• “Although I don’t have enough storage places my apartment is not a mess”
• “Although the apartment is rented it is built right”
By flipping the situation 180 degrees, I was able to very quickly find some creative solutions: such as getting my cleaner to come more than once a week for a shorter ‘maintenance clean’, building a special space for the enormous amount of laundry that is being piled on an everyday basis, renovating our rented place, assigning specific times and duties for organizing the place, etc.
So much for the ideation phase – I guess you’re wondering about what we implemented? Well, we ended up renovating the apartment, adding a significant space to one of our bedrooms making the living-room a little bit smaller. And the mess? I’d be lying if I say it’s disappeared but it has improved for sure.



























